33.Morrison, G. C., and W. W. Nazaroff. 2000. The Rate of Ozon | Aprenda como utilizar o Dióxido de Cloro

33.Morrison, G. C., and W. W. Nazaroff. 2000. The Rate of Ozone Uptake on Carpets: Experimental Studies. Environmental Science and Technology. 34:4963-4968.

34.Noss, C., W. Dennis, and V. Olivieri. 1985. Reactivity of Chlorine Dioxide with Nucleic Acids and Proteins. In R. Jolley (ed.), Water Chlorination: Environmental Impact and Health Effects. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.

35.Olivieri, V. P., et al. 1985. Mode of Action of Chlorine Dioxide on Selected Viruses. In R. Jolley (ed.), Water Chlorination: Environmental Impact and Health Effects. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.

36.Peleg, M., and M. B. Cole. 1998. Reinterpretation of Microbial Survival Curves. Critical Reviews in Food Science. 38(5):353-80.

37.Raber, E., A. Jin, K. Noonan, R. McGuire, and R. D. Kirvel. 2001. Decontamination Issues for Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents: How Clean is Clean Enough? International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 11:128-48.

38.Rapson, W. H. 1966. From Laboratory Curiosity to Heavy Chemical. Chemistry Canada. 18(1):2531.

39.Reiss, R., P. B. Ryan, P. Koutrakis, and S. I. Tibbetts. 1995. Ozone Reactive Chemistry on Interior Latex Paint. Environmental Science and Technology. 29:1906-12.

40.Rice, E. W., K. R. Fox, R. J. Miltner, D. A. Lytle, and C. H. Johnson. 1996. Evaluating Plant Performance with Endospores. Journal of the American Water Works Association. 88(9):122-130.

41.Richardson, S. D., A. D. Thruston, Jr., T. V. Caughran, P. H. Chen, T. W. Collette, K. M. Schenck, B. W. Lykins, Jr., C. Rav-Acha, and V. Glezer. 2000. Identification of New Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts from Ozone, Chlorine Dioxide, Chloramine, and Chlorine. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 123:95-102.

42.Rosenblatt, D. H., A. A. Rosenblatt, and J. A. Knapp. July 21, 1987 1987. U.S. patent 4,681,739.

43.Rosenblatt, D. H., A. A. Rosenblatt, and J. E. Knapp. March 12, 1985 1985. U.S. patent 4,504,442.

[*] Microbial inactivation is frequently stated in “logs”. Each log represents a factor of 10 reduction. So 1 log indicates 90% reduction, 2 logs indicates 99% reduction, etc. The rationale for this is that often (but not always) there is a constant time required for each additional log of inactivation. This is called “Chick’s Law” (7). So for the results here, assuming Chick’s Law, it would require 6•4.4 = 27 minutes to achieve 6 logs removal.

[†] There are a variety of technologies such as use of ascorbic acid, use of reduced iron compounds, or use of reduced sulfur compounds, that exist for this purpose.

[‡] My comments in this section are focused on agencies outside DOD, since the information with respect to DOD capabilities in the areas of interest are far from clear to individuals outside DOD.

https://t.me/leoaraujo
https://www.house.gov/science/full/nov08/haas.htm